Texas Wic Baby Food Fruit or Veg 4
(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or 2nd trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing iv out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is cocky-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-nineteen Vaccine Rubber in Meaning Persons." Just as disturbing equally the data is the fact that the written report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth almost vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, nosotros checked with our ain science contacts to review the data and double bank check all the math. In doing so, nosotros were able to confirm 2 things:
- Yes, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters.
- Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring fault that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this report was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating significant women is perfectly safe. Merely the study information actually show quite the oppose.
Hither'southward how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Table four from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their starting time vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their get-go or second trimesters. (You take to read the fine print below the tabular array to run into this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-calendar week marking. These are indicated every bit "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In unproblematic math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the commencement twenty weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or 2nd trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these significant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to notation that deaths of unborn babies during the 3rd trimester are known as "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Thus, the written report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another manner, information technology is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first fourth dimension during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the start twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the showtime 20 weeks (and significant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to prevarication with statistics," because they evidently tried to pull a sleight-of-paw trick to make it appear that vaccines are rubber for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the get-go 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this information set. (It's a small-scale set up of 127 significant women, and then we'd like to come across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear flick.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science report request the question, "What percent of lemons are xanthous?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number l. They mistakenly dissever 50 into 100 considering at that place are 100 total slice of fruit, then they declare, "l% of lemons are xanthous" considering it'south 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/fifty, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That'due south the right answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can't exercise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the world around us.
Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the get-go 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous ballgame rate is but 12.half dozen%. Why? Because they're roofing up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, virtually probable.
In fact, the primal author of the written report, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to certificate adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no pregnant risk of adverse events? For case, here's another study he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Issue Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify whatever new or unexpected prophylactic concerns after TIV-ID."
Just is that conclusion based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to meaning women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Possibly this aforementioned written report architect has made the same systematic error (or perchance a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the starting time time one author was constitute to have fabricated systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, past pointing out errors and enervating they exist addressed and corrected. We tin't but accept bad math and telephone call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, it's clear that 4 out of five pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the pocket-size information ready nosotros have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins direct assault reproductive organs such equally the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with man cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine skilful and editor of ii medical journals. Although he does not characterize this every bit a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on meaning women is "shameful." You lot can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that live births may plummet by three.2 meg over the adjacent year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, eye attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human being race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'southward country management czar once characterized human children as an "environmental risk."
This is a war. A bioweapons set on. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the entire human being race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.
Acquire more in today'south mind-opening State of affairs Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Texas Wic Baby Food Fruit or Veg 4"
Post a Comment